Why Millennials and Gen Z Shouldn’t Follow Their Parents’ Retirement Plan

For decades, the standard advice for retirement planning has remained largely unchanged: maximize contributions to a 401(k), invest in a mix of stocks and bonds, and withdraw around 4% annually after retirement. This strategy worked well for Baby Boomers and Gen Xers who had pensions, higher interest rates on savings, and a more predictable stock market. But for Millennials and Gen Z, these traditional plans are failing.

The Reality of Failed Retirement Plans

Many of today’s retirees are struggling despite following conventional wisdom. Studies show that nearly 40% of Americans fear running out of money in retirement, and around 50% of retirees rely primarily on Social Security—a program with an uncertain future.

Why the Traditional Approach No Longer Works:

  • The 4% rule is outdated: Originally based on historical market performance, the 4% withdrawal rule no longer holds up in today’s volatile economic landscape.
  • Pensions are disappearing: Many Baby Boomers had pension plans guaranteeing income for life. Millennials and Gen Z will mostly rely on personal savings.
  • Market-driven plans are unpredictable: Retirees who saw their 401(k)s crash during the 2008 recession and COVID-19 downturn experienced significant financial stress.

According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), nearly half of Americans nearing retirement have less than $100,000 saved—far from the million-dollar nest egg typically recommended. Clearly, the traditional approach isn’t working.

What’s Different for Millennials and Gen Z?

1. Longer Life Expectancy

Millennials and Gen Z are expected to live longer than previous generations, meaning retirement savings must last 30-40 years or more. This increases the risk of outliving savings, a problem exacerbated by volatile market performance.

2. The Gig Economy and Career Instability

Unlike their parents, who often worked for the same company for decades, younger generations change jobs frequently. Many rely on gig work, freelance jobs, or self-employment, making access to employer-sponsored retirement plans like 401(k)s less reliable.

3. Inflation and Rising Costs

With inflation eroding the value of savings, keeping money in low-interest savings accounts or relying solely on stock market growth is risky. A 401(k) growing at 7% annually loses purchasing power when inflation is 3-4% per year.

4. Market Volatility

While previous generations benefited from long-term market growth, Millennials and Gen Z have witnessed two major financial crises before turning 40. Relying on the stock market alone makes retirement savings highly vulnerable to crashes.

Why Retirement Income Matters More Than a Nest Egg

Most financial advisors emphasize building a large nest egg, but a more effective strategy is focusing on guaranteed retirement income. Instead of accumulating a massive lump sum, younger investors should prioritize assets that provide stable, lifelong cash flow.

Here’s why:

  • You don’t have to guess how long your money will last – Guaranteed income streams eliminate the fear of running out of savings.
  • You’re less affected by market downturns – A recession won’t wipe out your monthly retirement check.
  • You can enjoy retirement without worrying about withdrawals – Instead of rationing a lump sum, you receive consistent cash flow.

Better Strategies for Millennials and Gen Z

1. Cash Value Life Insurance for Stability

Unlike 401(k)s, which are tied to the market, cash value life insurance provides a predictable growth rate and can be accessed tax-free. These policies:

2. Alternative Investments for Diversification

Instead of relying solely on stocks and bonds, Millennials and Gen Z should consider alternative investments that provide steady returns with lower volatility.

3. Liquidity Over Locking Up Money

Traditional retirement accounts force savers to keep money locked away until age 59½ or face heavy penalties. Younger generations need flexibility to invest in businesses, real estate, or high-return opportunities.

Using cash value life insurance allows:

Retirement Strategy Comparison

Retirement Strategy John (401(k) & 4% Rule) Michael (Guaranteed Income Strategy)
Total Retirement Savings $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Withdrawal Rate 4% per year Contractually guaranteed income
Annual Income $40,000 (subject to market risk) $70,000+ (guaranteed for life)
Market Volatility Impact High—income fluctuates based on portfolio performance None—income is stable and predictable
Longevity Risk High—risk of outliving savings if withdrawals exceed growth None—income lasts for life
Legacy Value Dependent on remaining balance Potential cash value + death benefit
Tax Efficiency Taxed at withdrawal (ordinary income tax rates) Potential tax-free income options
Peace of Mind Low—dependent on market conditions High—secured, reliable income

Michael’s strategy provides nearly 75% more income while eliminating market risk, longevity risk, and withdrawal uncertainty, making it a more stable and reliable approach for retirement planning.

The Bottom Line

Millennials and Gen Z can’t afford to blindly follow their parents’ retirement strategy. With market volatility, disappearing pensions, and longer lifespans, they need more flexibility and stability than a standard 401(k) provides.

By shifting the focus from building a nest egg to creating guaranteed income, younger generations can retire with certainty, control, and financial freedom—without relying on the stock market’s unpredictable swings.

Take Control of Your Financial Future

If you’re ready to explore a modern approach to retirement planning, contact our team today to start building a strategy that works for you.